Monthly Archives: September 2014

Israel

If there is one thing guaranteed to split opinion strongly in any polite dinner party it’s the Palestinian Israeli conflict which has flared up again over the last month or two.
I will always stand with Israel as the first line of defence against militant Islam. If you care about the future of the world then you will stand foursquare with Israel who are the canary in the mine. Unlike the majority of democracies in the West Israel’s first priority is to survive against a murderous foe who wish to destroy them and build a worldwide caliphate. It’s OK for people over here in the UK to criticize Israel for disproportionate responses, the media, radical leftists, Moslems and other assorted denizens who swallow the liberal worldview of organizations like the BBC, but if you live in Israel or have visited that country as I have you know that it’s a bit like people throwing bricks into your back garden all the time. What would you do with a terrorist enclave parked next door to you?
I’d say the first responsibility of any government is the safety and security of its citizens, and that means having a very powerful military designed to crush anyone who invades or attacks your nation. That means using overwhelming force if necessary to protect the lives of the people under your wing. There is a wider strategic issue here. Hamas represent militant Islam, and come from the very same stable as the ISIS fanatics sweeping through Iraq, El Shabab in Somalia, Boko Haram in Nigeria and all the other Islamist movements worldwide. So when you see ’Jihad John’ on the front pages of your newspapers involved in yet another beheading it’s the exact same spirit driving him as the spirit driving those Hamas fighters in Gaza. And some of these dangerous people are walking the streets of Britain as evidenced by the Lee Rigby tragedy. It is simply a many headed monster with the same root. So the west had better know its enemy. If the US is making airstrikes against the Islamic State in Iraq to stop genocide they should be ready to give Hamas no quarter. The same spirit that drives Hamas as they fight Israel is coming for us in the west and hates us almost as much as it hates Israel. That point is fundamental, and that spirit could make its presence felt in greater measure on British streets sooner than we think, so Britain needs to be on a ‘war footing.’
Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East where Jews and Arabs live alongside one another and Arabs have more rights than anywhere else in the Middle East, they can even enter government, and still we get accusations of Israel being Nazis or racist, of being an apartheid state and goodness knows what else. Aramaic and Arab Christians in Israel even join the IDF even though they are exempted from national service. Israel gives great freedom to religious minorities, so the Jewish state’s Christian minority is treated much better than in surrounding Arab nations such as Egypt, Syria and Iraq. Politicians and churchmen, bishops and university professors, ant Semites and Jew haters pontificate from on high about the wrongs of Israeli actions, but Israel understands better than any country on earth the mentality of the people they are dealing with. They understand that the only way you deal with militant Islam on a political and state level is with overwhelming force, because sadly force is the only word that militant Islamists understand, bar any of them having a Damascene conversion experience.

One of the most underappreciated things in this issue is the difference in mindset between your average British liberal and a militant Islamist. Relatively few if any indigenous Brits in our present climate understand the mindset they are facing or have any idea of the level of ruthlessness needed to deal with it. The western mind set is so conditioned by human rights, diversity and anti discrimination ideology that you really wonder whether if confronted by great evil, we would be effectively able to deal with it. It is no surprise to me that because Israel understands far better what they are dealing with than we do, a recent poll said that 86.5% of Israelis believe that Israel must destroy Hamas in this operation, and that there must be no permanent ceasefire until that has been achieved. So Israel sadly has a huge problem because of the level of casualties that will be suffered.
Of course none of this means that I support any and every Israeli action, they make mistakes just like any other nation in the conduct of war and otherwise. But they are defending their land, an ancient homeland going back thousands of years, way, way before Islam or even Christianity ever appeared as the new kid on the block. They now have their own land back after nearly 2000 years of exile. They are a tiny country, only the size of Wales, and it is unrealistic to expect them to give up any more of their land. Gaza is a parable of what will happen if they concede any more land. Under Ariel Sharon Israel withdrew from Gaza, only to have a terrorist enclave develop on their doorstep. They have every right to defend themselves just like any other country on earth.
The state of Israel is a modern miracle whatever you say. It has made the desert bloom and is a remarkably gifted and technologically advanced economy, despite its problems. It is number 19 in the world HDI (Human Development Index) which is a measure of economic development in terms of GDI, life expectancy and education. Even great Britons of the past such as Lord Shaftsbury recognized before the state of Israel was ever set up that the Jews needed a homeland after wandering the earth for thousands of years. Israel now is a final refuge for Jews whenever they are hounded out of countries around the world that take a dislike to them. There is a dangerous rise of anti Israel sentiment rising up in Europe right now which is mixed up with anti-Semitism. Those who try to delegitimize Israel are treading on very shaky ground. A litmus test of any culture or society is how it treats its Jews, and I would add to that whether it supports Israel or not. It ties in with our very humanity and regard for our fellow man.
You now have a group called BDS, Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, the leaders of which have stated their movement’s goal is the end of Israel, even rejecting a two state solution. You just cannot boycott everything Israel produces in the twenty first century, when things like instant messaging , voicemail technology and SIM cards were developed in Israel! Such a group should be vigorously opposed and exposed.
The media has a very powerful grip on the mindset of the west, and so is answerable for a lot. That’s why we need to sift and weigh up what we hear, aligned with personal experience and gut feeling. We have heard plenty about Hamas cynically using human shields and their disregard for human life, that’s not difficult to swallow given the track record of militant Islam. There is plenty of talk of how Hamas use schools and hospitals to cynically base arms, knowing they will be targeted by Israel. Just how much power do Hamas hold over journalists and news broadcasters through intimidation, threats of violence, bullying and even bribery? Everyone has their price. To what extent is the UN compromised by Israel haters within its ranks?
It’s best not just to swallow one point of view, and it’s also worth listening to people who know just a little bit more about the circumstances in Gaza than your average armchair pundit in the west. That’s why it’s worth listening to the son of a Hamas founder here speaking on American TV giving us the truth about Hamas, and not some of the politically correct casserole we get in the British media. There is nothing like listening to someone who has been in the situation and knows the mindset of the terrorist. ‘Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.’ I always remember Shimon Peres saying on TV years ago that the PLO had one language for Europe and another for the Middle East. It is the same with groups like Hamas, they have one language to suit the western liberal progressive taste, the language of victimhood and so on, and another language that fits the Middle East. It is in their interest to paint Israel in the worst possible light to western viewers to win the propaganda battle. It takes a little bit more discernment to understand exactly the rights and wrongs of this conflict.
Here is the clip:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=KakxXN5Z-XI

A huge amount is made of proportionality in this conflict. Where do they get this idea of proportionality? Have military leaders over the centuries sat down before a battle and discussed whether they are going to kill and injure an excessive amount of people in comparison with their own potential losses. In the Second World War the UK and US flattened one city after another in Germany to help bring the war to an end, and the US resorted to an atom bomb to finish off the Japanese. How many military commanders in recent times have thought of proportionality in their dealings with the enemy, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, the Balkans, etc. Regardless of losses, horrific and wasteful on both sides, I hardly think the Israeli military go out of their way to kill as many people as possible.
Don’t forget the provocation Israel has had. The Israel Defence Force website reports that since Israel withdrew from the Gaza strip in 2005 terrorists have fired more than 11000 rockets into Israel, with over 5million Israelis under threat of rocket attacks. Let’s just think about the area they are targeting. Israel as I say is the size of Wales, or if you think of it in terms of London and the south east of England, very roughly similar in area to a chunk of England stretching down to Bournemouth and north towards Cambridge. The Hamas charter has the basic goal of destroying the State of Israel and their foot-soldiers are tucked into the borders of your nation. It would be a bit like belligerents continually firing rockets into the Home Counties from northern France. Can you imagine England sitting back for years and doing nothing about it?
If the world is so concerned about the bloodshed in Gaza perhaps they should get together with Israel to take some responsibility for the area and negotiate some sort of occupation to weed out the terrorists and help destroy all the terror tunnels that have been built with cement supplied by Israel to build houses in Gaza. You could not make it up! At the moment Israel may have to consider such a nuclear option themselves, to occupy an area they withdrew from years ago to destroy the terrorist infrastructure designed to destroy Israel.
Let me quote the former Commander of British Forces in Afghanistan, Colonel Richard Kemp CBE, who recently said in an interview:

“I would say that the Jewish people should be extremely proud of the state of Israel, they should try their best to disregard the terrible anti-Israeli propaganda that is designed solely to contribute to the conspiracy to exterminate the state of Israel – I myself, am personally outraged by the shocking anti-Semitic violence and verbal attacks that have been triggered by this conflict against Jews, especially in Paris and Germany, but also in Britain and other countries – it’s absolutely despicable and should be fought by authorities as vigorously as possible.”
The same Richard Kemp has praised the IDF for doing ‘more to safeguard the rights of civilians in the combat zone than any other army in the history of warfare.’
Food for thought!

Good government starts directly with you!

It is often said that we get the government we deserve. We castigate government and politicians for all sorts of reasons, lack of integrity, lying, bullying, sexual impropriety, but perhaps the behaviour of government simply reflects the behaviour of society at large.

Here are some interesting quotes:

The Bible, Proverbs 16 v 32: ‘He that is slow to anger is better than the mighty, and he that rules his own spirit than he that takes a city.’

‘Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled, either by a power within them, or by a power without them; either by the word of God, or by the strong arm of man, either by the Bible, or by the bayonet.’ Robert C Winthrop, Addresses and Speeches on various occasions, 1852.

“When a people shall have become incapable of governing themselves, and fit for a master, it is of little consequence from what quarter he comes.” George Washington.

“If we will not be governed by God, we must be governed by tyrants.” William Penn.

The implication here is that some form of self government is the best for society, springing from great self control or individuals being answerable to some higher power. If people cannot control themselves the government will step in to protect us from one another’s harmful behaviour. The greater the number of potentially uncivilised behaviours, the greater the number of restrictions on our lives. And often, we all suffer.

The papers are full of stories every week that reflect peoples’ inability to control their own behaviour. In many cases everybody suffers to minimise the dangers from a tiny number of potential offenders. More laws are called for, or more restrictions are put on peoples’ freedom to protect society from potential criminals.

Because of the dangers of paedophiles and child molesters all teachers and those working with children have had to be CRB checked regardless of whether or not those people have any criminal record. In the news recently was a report that in Magaluf on the Mediterranean island of Mallorca the authorities have decided to crack down on pub crawls because of the level of disorder from English youngsters. This is after an incident when a teenage girl was seen performing sex acts on more than 20 men in public. No surprises there that a crackdown came. Also recently there were calls for more laws to protect people from abuse and bullying in cyberspace. The list could go on and on of calls for more laws to restrict bad behaviour.

Writing in the Guardian recently (July 12th 2014) Hari Kunzru touches on this and actually relates it back to faith implicated in my earlier quotes when he says: ‘In general ‘faith’ makes people much easier to govern – after all they’re already being governed by God, who has panoptical security cameras and already knows what’s in everyone’s browser history. No wonder politicians line up to praise it. If only everyone possessed this salutary quality!’

Some politicians indeed understand these things, even in their own lives they are aware of guiding principles ruling their behaviour. Gordon Brown, son of the manse, when becoming Prime Minister spoke of his moral compass. John Major used his ‘back to basics’ campaign in an effort to return to ‘certain values.’ Here are his words in a speech he made on the 8th October 1993.

‘The old values – neighbourliness, decency, courtesy – they’re still alive, they’re still the best of Britain. They haven’t changed, and yet somehow people feel embarrassed by them. Madam President, we shouldn’t be. It is time to return to those old core values, time to get back to basics, to self-discipline and respect for the law, to consideration for others, to accepting a responsibility for yourself and your family and not shuffling off on other people and the state.’

This all backfired somewhat after a series of scandals hit the Conservative party, and Mr Major himself was later found to have been having an extra marital affair which must have left much of the population agog with astonishment.

However we have touched on an important principle for good government in any nation at any time in any place. Good government is directly related to the discipline and self control of its people. It guarantees that you have a much more healthy balance between those who are governed and the governors themselves, who should after all be the servants of the governed. Nobody would dispute that any country needs good government. Whether we actually have good government is another matter. But if we want good government in any nation it first starts with you as an individual, yes each one of us in our own lives.

Good government starts with you. If you can control yourself you don’t need an outside authority to control you. The more an internal ‘law’ keeps you in order, the less an outside law needs to keep you in order. You are no threat to those around you because you know how to control yourself in day to day discourse.

The less self discipline and self control a population has, the more a government has to step in with coercive measures. New Labour were known for making a huge number of laws. To what extent they were trying to control peoples’ bad behaviour and to what extent they were just passing too many laws to impose an ideology upon the nation is an interesting question.

Here is a quote by Philip Johnson in the Telegraph in March 2010. He writes that in his ten years as Prime Minister Tony Blair presided over more than 3000 new laws, more than 1000 of which carried jail terms. Their incessant law making was disturbing to say the least. I’d say that was sign of a corrupt government. Or maybe they thought the people of this nation couldn’t control themselves as well as they used to. Maybe it’s in their DNA and that’s why a socialist government should never ideally be allowed to govern this nation. It’s been said in general that socialists use the law to make people ‘good,’ conservatives use the law to punish bad people. The socialist interpretation is a misunderstanding of the nature and limits of government. The inner compass cannot be imposed by law. That has to come from other sources, the settled mores of an established culture, family and the teaching of right from wrong which comes from institutions such as school and church, but primarily should come from family. When a government takes these responsibilities, you know a culture is on its death bed.

Mr Robert C Winthrop’s quote above says you either rule people through the Bible or the Sword. My, that would get all the cappuccino sucking liberals choking on their coffee. Highly controversial nowadays as so many people have jettisoned Christianity. But what do you put in the place of Christianity as a restraining influence on peoples’ bad behaviour? Take your pick! You either have a people who know how to behave through the internal restraints of conscience or you have men and women who cannot control their natural appetites who need an increasingly ruthless external authority to keep them in order.

Self control springs from character and integrity, two qualities that are in short supply today. The measure of any man or woman is their character and integrity. That is the way you measure success in life or otherwise. Not by what they do or how much they earn, but by their character and how they deal with those around them. The west is performance orientated, people are valued or measured according to the power of their personality, their looks, their earning power of status in society. Yet these things should play second fiddle to character. But we tend to look on the outward appearance or talents rather than what’s inside. How many of us are excited by a person with self control rather than a person with charisma, good looks and high intelligence? Who would you rather spend a night in a pub with, a man about town with a hint of danger in their eye or a man who has been faithful to his wife for 30 years but seriously lacks charisma. People are overawed or overwhelmed by attractive natural ability and underwhelmed by steady faithful unexciting character.

What do we mean by a person of character and integrity? We could produce a long list of attributes, but one of those attributes is definitely self control, and that means dominion over your temper, your tongue and your appetites. A man or woman who can control their own temper is to be esteemed. That means you rule the spirit that is within you, it does not rule you. You are not easily roused to intemperate behaviour.

They know how to control their tongue, a rare thing again for most of us! Life and death is in the power of the tongue, we speak life with encouragement, praise and a ‘looking on the bright side’ attitude or we can speak death by continually running people down, moaning, complaining and gossiping. That’s a difficult one!

They can control their appetites. Whether it is longing for food, alcohol, sexual impropriety, money or a whole host of other things, allowing a particular appetite to control you can bring untold misery to others.

Self government is manifestly not everyone doing what is right in their own eyes. In such a society what is right to you may not be right to me, and I will still do what I want. There has to be a common set of mores, a standard of right and wrong that people more or less agree with. If you do not have that the nation begins to fall apart for what is the glue that holds it together anymore? So it’s not enough to control yourself. You also have to have general agreement in society as to the proper way to behave.

But we now live in a society where increasingly people do what is right in their own eyes regardless of traditional morality. The church has a diminished role in being the nation’s moral compass. In addition the drive towards a multicultural society magnifies the importance of all cultures and worldviews. We now have communities in the UK whose mind-set and ways of thinking are totally incompatible with the mind-set of the traditional Brit. This makes governing the nation much more difficult, especially when the authorities have encouraged immigrants to import their own culture without buying into what it means to be British.

So there you have it. The more internal constraints individuals have on their behaviour the less external constraints they will need. The more internal motivation to practice good behaviour, the less need there is for governmental authority to force people to conform to ‘expectations.’ A nation is the sum of its parts, and what is more valuable than a nation’s human resources? The strength of a nation is in the character of its people. That makes a nation great. Self control and self discipline are essential prerequisites of such a culture.

There are immeasurable benefits to a society whose people know how to govern themselves properly. For starters there is the effect on the nation’s finances. The UK has a vast fiscal deficit. I wonder how much it would be reduced if the courts, policing, security and prison services had less to do because the system was not under such strain from people who don’t know how to behave? More could be said on this but that would be the scope of another article.

George Washington said that the American constitution was only ever made for a spiritual and moral people. If that begins to break down, we move towards totalitarianism. Frighteningly the signs are that under Obama Barak particularly, the US is losing its freedom. I remember speaking to a Headmaster who said he thought the French were more ungovernable than the English, what with their farm protests and so on. Secularists and atheists may not like it, but a significant proportion of the older generation in this country went to Sunday School where they received a Bible education which taught them clearly what was right and wrong. Did that give them the internal compass which helped make the English a relatively law abiding nation certainly in the past? Even now, are we living on the moral and spiritual capital that has been built up in previous generations?

Whatever you say, I believe unless politicians have a fundamental understanding of the importance of self government for a nation’s health and welfare, and are prepared to debate how we can rediscover such a quality, we will continue to slide down the darkening trajectory we have set ourselves.

Just a thought!