Monthly Archives: February 2015

The Middle East is different

Today’s news reports tell us that ISIS have now established a bridgehead in Libya and their next target is Europe. Meanwhile the southern border of the U.S. is under the same threat from ISIS if they do not tighten up border control. Don’t believe that ISIS only have designs on Europe. Given Obama’s political colours tightening borders could be a tricky task.

There is a lesson here for all of us, especially politicians, and if there are any around at the moment, statesmen, that you meddle in regime change in the Middle East at your peril. One thing I have observed in my limited reading of the situation is that strongmen in power in the Middle East, even with their associated levels of nastiness, are often far better than the alternatives.

This does not mean I would always advocate keeping the strongman in power while holding your nose. I think there was an arguable case for removIng Sadaam Hussein from power by force. That was the only word he understood, and who knows what was in his heart. He certainly wanted to attack Israel and could have caused no end of mayhem in the region, especially as he had expansionary ambitions as we saw with Kuwait. But this does not nullify the extreme caution we should exercise when advocating regime change in the Middle East.

Look at the whole ‘Arab Spring’ episode, when the West was duly trumpeting the dawn of democracy in the region. One regime after another fell and mayhem has followed in many places.

Egypt was ruled by Mubarak who was overthrown to be replaced by Morsi, who proved to be a front for a militantly Islamic regime that steamed immediately into its totalitarian instincts. And this regime change was all supported by the West. When Morsi was opposed by the Egyptian people out on the streets en masse (all credit to them) there was tut tutting from the West about trying to get rid of a legitimate government. But again the liberal West has little grasp of the nuances of Egyptian politics, Islamist threats and the fear of the Moslem Brotherhood. Egypt has faced enormous upheaval since Mubarak went, something supported by the U.S. and European governments, yet would it not have been better to have tried to keep Mubarak where he was? A strong leader is what Middle Eastern nations need to keep the extreme Islamists in their place. Such leaders understand exactly what medicine is needed to keep these people in line, and that means utter ruthlessness, something we in the West left behind a long time ago.

It’s the same in Syria. The West bleats about the terrible tyrant Assad and the way he goes on. Yes, we would have issues with such a man, but under Assad Christians had more freedom than virtually anywhere else in the Middle East apart from perhaps Israel. Now that Syria is in chaos and various Islamic extremists try to gain control, Christians are the ones caught in the ensuing bloodbath. In the Middle East Christians are in danger of being extinguished as militant Islam shows its true colours, adhering to their mantra, ‘First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people’ (Jews and Christians). Thank God David Cameron’s idea of going into Syria was defeated in the Commons vote. We could have been complicit in aiding some of the nastiest radicals In the region gaining power, perhaps ISIS themselves.

And then there is Libya of course. Granted, Colonel Gaddafi was a deeply unpleasant dictatorial leaders, but perhaps he was a bulwark against something far nastier. Perhaps we should have taken the post Gaddafi vacuum far more seriously. We went in with our RAF jets to help get rid of him, and now Libya is in turmoil and ISIS are at the gates of the European continent. What did Gaddafi himself say? When he was still alive in his Bedouin tent he said, ‘If, instead of a stable government that guarantees security, these militias linked to Bin Laden take control, the Africans will move en masse towards Europe,’ adding that ‘the Mediterranean will become a sea of chaos.’

So it’s the same story in Egypt, Syria and Libya. Former tyrants have been ousted, only to open the way to something far worse. I remember a friend of mine telling me how years ago he had prophesied that if the Shah of Persia was ousted something far worse would replace him. How right he was as the Ayatollah Khomeini filled the vacuum with a hard line Islamic state imposed upon the people of Iran. When will we ever learn. Unfortunately the way it works in some of these countries is that you need someone very, very strong to keep the crazies in order. It has even been said of a country like Russia that they are an aggressive people and need a strong leader to keep them in order.

We now have to face the possibility that because of the policies of our governments aiding and abetting the downfall of admittedly unpleasant dictatorships we have opened the way for ISIS to now become a mortal threat to Europe itself, to old settled liberal societies that at present show little stomach for a fight.

The mentality of the globalists

‘Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.’ If you want to know the measure of a man, what makes him tick, what lies in his very core, all you have to do is listen to what he says. that reveals what is in the heart. There will be those that scoff at the idea that globalists exist, people out to control the planet and remake it in their image. Maybe paying attention to what Mr Peter Sutherland has to say will enlighten us.

Just listen to his expert views on the subject of mass immigration, that the people of the UK ‘still nurse a sense of homogeneity and difference from others.’ He said later, ‘and that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.’ He has also said that ‘there should be a shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states.’

Who is Peter Sutherland? KCMG, SC, UN Special Representative on Migration, former Attorney General of Ireland, ex Chairman of the Allied Irish Bank and European Commissioner, ex Chairman of BP, now non-executive director of Goldman Sachs International, in fact a whole string of titles that make him the grand panjandrum of this particular brand. He is now Head of the Global Forum on Migration and Development. Michael Kantor called him the ‘father of globalisation. In his view opposition to globalisation is ‘morally indefensible.’ Mr Peter Sutherland is a very big shot in the relentless drive by the so called global elite to weld the nations together into one big melting pot, convinced of the rightness of their cause.

In his view migration is a ‘crucial dynamic for economic growth’ in some European countries, ‘however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens. In his view declining populations of certain EU countries means multiculturalism is not only inevitable but deeply desirable – It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them.

Well that’s at least in his opinion. So he’ll be rejoicing in the fact that the border of the UK will be fully open to the latest potential influx from Rumania and Bulgaria. No doubt he will be knocking back a few celebratory drinks at the thought of the UK’s sense of homogeneity being further weakened by a good further dose of eastern Europeans, whose numbers aiming to get to these shores no one has any idea of.

Here’s the link to the BBC article on this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

 

I have little doubt that another well known globalist, George Soros, will be jointly rejoicing.

Pre-election goodies

It’s coming up to election time so the legacy parties are broadcasting their wares for the punters. Money talks, so if the politicians can convince us through pecuniary means that we should vote for them then surely they are doing what comes naturally. Thing is, of course the government has no money. First it has to get it off the taxpayer and then it can use it to encourage as many people as possible to vote for it. This is reality and as long as the sun shines by day and the moon by night you cannot stop a degree of offering financial benefits to the electors to win their vote. These days that’s a very high degree. The degree to which any government tries to buy peoples’ votes will be in inverse proportion to the spiritual and moral integrity of that government. But then the government also reflects who we are as a people and the type of society we have built, so as George Osborne said, we are all in it together.

Two articles in the Times this last week illustrate the pre-election courting of the voters is cooking on gas as George and Ed fall over themselves to persuade us to vote for them.

So we have George Osborne aiming his sights fair and square at the silver surfers, the older members of the population who make up a substantial proportion of the voter base. No doubt Dave and George are terrified of the purple peril looming at their shoulders that has quite a lot of appeal for a lot of older voters who quite frankly resent being patronised by politicians over their ‘outdated’ views on things like the EU and gay marriage. The silver surfers comprise a substantial proportion of the electorate and so are a lucrative target for the main parties. They also tend to take their voting responsibilities seriously. Uncomfortably for the left, this vast swathe of people often tend to be more conservative in their thinking and so it will significantly be a fight between the Tories and UKIP for this section of the electorate.

What is George proposing? Nothing less than a multimillion pound bonds windfall for the over 65s, with pensioner bonds being given market leading savings rates. He has extended the 65 plus pensioner bonds scheme for another three months, until just after the election, after huge demand. It looks like about 1 in 10 of all pensioners will take part in the scheme. Thing is, this is all going to cost taxpayers rather a lot of money at a time of as we all know of necessary austerity, an estimated £500 million over 5 years. Mark Littlewood, director general of the Institute of Economic Affairs states that ‘borrowing more expensively than the government needs to is a direct subsidy to wealthy pensioners from the working age population.’

On the other hand, with eye wateringly low interest rates in recent times it has been tough for savers, many of whom are older people, so this helps to redress the balance some might argue. Borrowers such as those with tracker mortgages have had a whale of a time with lower repayments, whilst savers have had to put up with chicken feed. Bonds represent a fair rebalancing? However, there is one rule George appears to have broken and that is to borrow on the best terms for taxpayers. As Patrick Hosking, Financial Editor for the Times says, he could have borrowed the money at 0.3 per cent in the gilts market, instead he has borrowed at nine times that rate from pensioners.

Meanwhile David Cameron strongly hints he would protect universal pensioner benefits such as the winter fuel allowance and free TV licence. So the Conservatives are desperate for those silver votes.

Ed Milliband meanwhile is targeting new parents and working families with children with goodies from his gift bag. He was set to announce plans to give new fathers four weeks off work after a baby’s birth and to increase their statutory pay by £100 to at least £260 a week if he wins in May. This won’t be very popular with business groups, especially smaller companies. In addition of course Ed is planning to extend free childcare from 15 to 25 hours per week for working parents with three and four year olds. This would reduce spending on tax credits or benefits payments for low income families. Which is better, state subsidised work or state subsidised childcare?

So the parties line up to tell us how they are going to spend the money they have previously taken off us in tax. Trouble is, how well or badly the main parties intend to redistribute our money is not the main issue facing the UK. If people vote mainly on how much extra finance they will enjoy, or how much better off they could be financially, they could be voting for the increasingly swift demolition of our nation. It takes far sighted and perceptive voters to see through the short term financial gains being dangled in front of the electorate by the different parties, you might argue this is hoping for a bit too much from the average British voter. But there we are. There are far more salient issues to do with our survival as a cohesive nation than how much extra money we enjoy per year, and It’s going to be an interesting few months! The mantra, ‘it’s the economy, stupid’ does have its limits.

Militant Islam rears its ugly head

It would be odd for me not to say something about the events of this New Year when the blogosphere has probably been cooking on gas over the issue, so I will throw in my two-penny worth.

This is one area where the west suffers from a terrifying level of institutionalised foolishness in its handling of and attitude towards Islam. Hopefully the events in France will focus a few minds. Have a look at this quote from a man who has been in the Middle East cauldron and has witnessed Islamist wickedness first hand:

‘Our sufferings today are the prelude of those you, Europeans and Western Christians, will also suffer in the near future. I lost my diocese. The physical setting of my apostolate has been occupied by Islamic radicals who want us converted or dead. But my community is still alive. Try to understand us. Your liberal and democratic principles are worth nothing here. You must consider our reality in the Middle East because you are welcoming in your countries an ever growing number of Muslims. Also you are in danger. You must take strong and courageous decisions even at the cost of contradicting your principles. You think all men are equal, but that is not true. Islam does not say that all men are equal. Your values are not their values. If you do not understand this soon enough, you will become the victims of the enemy you have welcomed in your homes.’

Amel Nona, Chaldean Catholic Archbishop of Mosul, 2014.

Yes, this is the exiled Chaldean Archeparch of Mosul, where Christians have been settled for 1700 years. They are now being driven out or killed by the new Islamic State. Here speaks a man from first-hand experience and immense wisdom. He understands the deception being foisted on the west on a vast scale and David Cameron, Nick Clegg and David Milliband could do a lot worse than spending an hour with this man so he could give them all some much needed counsel.

No prominent western leader seems to understand the issue, neither Barak Obama, David Cameron, Angela Merkel or Francois Hollande who recently just came up with the same old line that the recent atrocities in France had ‘nothing to do with Islam.’ Do they really believe that their populations are all such fools?

What we are facing in the west is an extremely powerful spirit that inspires militant Islam, and its goal is control. It is a controlling spirit of the highest order that wants to control everything you say and everything you do. It starts with nice sounding words and clever speech, hijacking western concepts of democracy and individual rights by using the language of equality and human rights, but ends in the ‘concentration camp’ when it gets its way. Because the west is spiritually and morally bankrupt its defences are weak. Mr Obama and Mr Cameron believe that it is our economic strength that will help pull us through. At the White House in January it was a case of ‘we reaffirm our belief that our ability to defend our freedoms is rooted in our economic strength and the values that we cherish – freedom of expression, the rule of law and strong democratic institutions.’ This is only part of the picture, because essentially it is our spiritual and moral strength that will defeat the enemy, and those assets are at an all-time low. It would take a leader of incredible bravery and character to take on the institutionalised foolishness in this area because you would have the full force of the MSM plus the political elite screaming at you in ‘how can you be so offensive?’ mode. Nigel Farage began to do this in the last few days when he said that multiculturalism and mass immigration has been a massive failure and we need to acknowledge that, that we now have a Moslem fifth column in this country and that we need to stand up for our Christian heritage. That just attracted the usual ‘outrage’ from people like Cameron and Clegg who still just do not get it.

Churchill faced the same issues in the 30s when he prophetically saw what was happening in Germany with the Nazis and wanted to warn his countrymen. From 1933 to the beginning of World War 2 Churchill was not allowed to talk on British radio which was a government monopoly administered by the BBC. And he was an MP and former cabinet minister! Not allowed to use the radio to warn the British people because his views were too ‘controversial.’ Exactly the same now with the government taking the view that it is too ‘controversial’ to state the problem, and that is militant Islam, which is in Islam, wrapped up in it like a Russian doll within a Russian doll.

We are now reaching a tipping point in western society over the place of Islam in our cultures. After the outrages carried out in France by Islamist gunmen western governments and security services will be on high alert to thwart any other terrorist attacks. Let me say this quite clearly. Moslems who have no agenda to change the west into an Islamic caliphate and indeed want to get away from oppression pushed by political Islam are not the problem and must not be vilified in any way. But the problem is not such individual Moslems, it is Islam itself, because Islam has two faces, and within Islam hides militant Islam. You are dealing with the highest level of deception.

I am not quite sure about some of the recent demonstrating along the ‘Je suis Charlie’ lines. Charlie Hebdo was a publication which as far as I can see went out of its way to insult not just Islam but also Jews and Christians. I think very few of those demonstrating people would have actually published what Charlie Hebdo published on Islam. So it all seems a bit false. How many would want to stand with a publication that went out of its way to wind up the adherents of those faiths? It was certainly a case of freedom of expression although some would argue it was not very responsible use of that freedom. Having said that, you have to defend the right of people to express their viewpoints. If you want freedom of speech you have to accept people at the edge saying extremely edgy and insulting things, it’s the price of freedom. Nothing is off limits even if you wouldn’t say some things yourself. A mature society can handle it. There should be an incredibly high barrier. Only obvious incitement to violence should arguably be caught by the law.

This is a defining moment because we have heard enough now about double standards. You can say what you want about Christianity or Judaism but you cannot say certain things about Islam. You can burn a Bible in the UK and the police would do nothing but if you burn a copy of the Koran the authorities will come down on you like a ton of bricks. Double standards! That’s Islamic jurisdiction and sharia law which should have no sway at all in the UK. Institutionalised foolishness! Well that is the way it is in Islamic countries but it should not be the way of things in the UK. There is no reason at all why western society should stipulate that cartoons of Mohammad are beyond the pale. To restrict speech on Islam means you are causing the islamisation of your society. We are far down that road and as it has been said before the UK is on the way to becoming the first western nation to come under the heel of militant Islam because of our foolishness. If you want to know who controls you, just consider who you are not allowed to criticise. ‘Nuff said!’

I said a number of years ago words to the effect that Britain would show the world how to deal with Islam and I still tentatively stick with that although many would stand aghast and probably laugh like a drain at such a statement because they think we have reached a comatose level of dhimmitude. However one reason this might be the case is that the UK has gone further down the path of islamisation than most western nations and therefore a tipping point may be reached here before most other nations. I also believe there is a warrior spirit in the UK which has been fast asleep but once stirred into action is quite capable of doing what’s needed. It is grossly simplistic to see the UK as just a nation of unthinking apathetic individuals, blinded by reality TV and stuck in armchairs. The picture is far more nuanced than that. You only have to read the blogs and talk to people day by day to know they are very aware of the problem. Also the politicians do not represent the man in the street in their views on this issue. I am just waiting to see which western nation will see sense first and change the whole paradigm. This will provide leadership for the whole world.
A resolution needs to come between the UK and militant Islam sooner rather than later simply because the situation will deteriorate very quickly in favour of militant Islam if the can keeps getting kicked down the road. An imminent clash will be that much easier to handle than one ten years down the road. So 2015 could prove to be a pivotal year. This involves our governing authorities admitting very quickly that we have made serious mistakes by being nice to everyone and treating all cultures as equal.

The level of deception in this particular area is so great that very, very clever people have swallowed the lies hook, line and sinker. Hence we have the British PM, David Cameron, stating that Islam is a religion of peace and that the murder of Lee Rigby had nothing to do with Islam. Possibly the most dangerous deception in world politics today lies behind these viewpoints and is represented by an alliance cooked up in hell itself, between the hard left and militant Islam, which both have the same goals, the destruction of Judeo Christian civilisation. Strange bedfellows indeed, especially when it comes to things like homosexuality, but such is their hatred for what they want to destroy, that this hatred is more powerful than the unpalatable truth that later on Islam will swallow up the pink mafia. The LGBT contingent is much safer any day of the week in a Judeo Christian culture than an Islamic one. So the lies are spewed forth in the media that Islam is a peaceful religion, that immigration is not really the problem, that the people who commit these outrages are just marginalised, mentally ill or oppressed. This mind-set has such a hold over peoples’ thinking that if you stand firm against it you will face a sneering mocking spirit that flows out of the mouths of those who think that with all our fundamental differences we can just be one big happy family. They think they know best.

I know not what will happen but one thing I am very clear on is that the UK needs a leader like perhaps no time in its history every before. That person will have to step outside the box and discern the decisions that have to be made. They will have to be utterly courageous and have a face like flint. Such people do not hang like ripe fruit on an overladen apple tree. It is very difficult to see where such a leader could come from. Nigel Farage is speaking the most sense at present out of all the UK politicians as he hits the nail on the head by saying that we have a Moslem fifth column now in Britain that seeks to overthrow everything we hold dear and speaks strongly in defence of preserving our Christian heritage. He has more clue in his little finger than all the other soft left leaders we have at the moment.

For a leader, it is time to act confidently in what they believe and to speak with great resolve, intent, strength and authority. People will respect that and knuckle down. ‘You must take strong and courageous decisions even at the cost of contradicting your principles,’ says the Archeparch of Mosul. Quite! Serious changes have to be made. For one thing the authorities must recognise who the enemy is. That involves admitting that the problem is militant Islam, but it is still Islam, regardless of who you offend. That is a big step to dealing with the problem. The security state we live in also needs a rethink to stop wasting tax-payers money on checking absolutely everybody entering and leaving these shores. The authorities have to start homing in on dangerous people and do profiling and targeting those who are genuinely suspicious, instead of treating everybody as a potential terrorist criminal. But you can’t do that, it’s discriminatory. Tough, it’s common sense, and if you don’t like it, it’s reality. The whole issue of immigration needs a massive reality check. Always and every time a government’s first priority is the safety and security of its own people. If you do not understand that, you should not be in government.

One American commentator says that each American election that comes up is more important than the last one for the US. This is now very true for the UK. The 2015 election could prove to be a defining point in our history. The window of opportunity is narrowing quickly and if there is not a turning point in this election I predict that we will increasingly be in the grip of great darkness that will demolish what is left of this nation. The vacuum of leadership in the UK is critical and has to be filled, we must be hoping and praying that Great Britain will produce a leader to deal with the impending conflicts. Whatever you say, UKIP represents a very imperfect but encouraging sign that the tide is turning and that the iron grip that the politically correct elite has on this nation is beginning to be broken. Nigel Farage has said some very sensible things about the difficulties that mass immigration and the doctrine of multiculturalism have brought to our land. The nation needs to hear it.

Institututionalised foolishness!

There are now so many cases of what I call ‘institutionalised foolishness’ in the West now that you would be blogging all day and all night just to keep up with the latest example of how the authorities seem to have had a common sense bypass operation in many areas. It is hard to say which nation has gone further into such ‘moonbattery’ as one commentator calls it, but the UK is right up there, together with other old stalwarts of the traditional West like Canada, the US and Australia. Then there is the outlandish stories you hear from the Nordic contingent, especially Sweden, and so it goes on.

The Daily Mail reported on its front page recently that schools have been logging incidents of ‘hate crime’ for local authorities committed by, wait for it, little children in school. Incidents of racist, homophobic, zenophobic or perhaps even islamophobic abuse on one child by another is enough to get you a record as a ‘nasty little bigot.’ Records of such ‘prejudice labelled behaviour’ can be passed on to the next school. Offences of 4000 pupils were logged in just 13 council areas. Here’s a quote from Josie Appleton of the Manifesto Club, a civil liberties group, to make a grown man choke into his cereal:

‘One primary school pupil calling another a girl suddenly becomes a sign of gender image prejudice, subjected to recording requirements more thorough than accompanying most burglaries. A reality check is urgently required.’

Institutionalised foolishness. This would be laughable if it was not so frightening. Of course this is all targeted hate crime, the type that the authorities have decided is unacceptable. All other types of ‘hate crime,’ say that committed against Roman Catholics, Christians or white Anglo Saxon men, or the hate expressed by the aggressive foul language that we hear and see every day on our TVs and in the media, or the innumerable slights and insults made between millions up and down the nation largely escapes all this as it does not fulfil the purposes of the deceived minds behind the legislation pushing such actions.

This poison originated with New Labour, the most harmful government the UK has experienced in generations, and thankfully the coalition pulled back from rolling it out further and left schools to use their own discretion (although I can imagine a few Lib Dems might have argued for it!) but recording and reporting evidently still goes on. In 2012 to 2013 4348 incidents were reported to 13 LEAs (Local Education Authorities). Nevertheless the whole state apparatus is still there to persecute dissenters on a wider scale. We have a new ‘Witchfinder General’ in the form of our paternal state that must control, what we say and how we think for our own good, a kind of soft totalitarianism, but this will eventually become hard totalitarianism. It is nothing less than part of a vicious assault on everything we hold dear, because there are forces at work to crush freedom completely in this land. Control can come from the right or the left of the political spectrum. At present it is coming from the left, but both extremes can be equally harmful to freedom.

In the papers there has also been the story of an Ofsted inspection at a Christian school in the north east where the school was found severely wanting, but only by the warped standards of political correctness. It has caused a lot of distress, including amongst parents. One child was quizzed about what lesbians did and as a result greatly upset, and another about Moslems. A reference to terrorism by the child did not go down too well with the inspectors, surprise surprise! Meanwhile other youngsters were asked if they knew any boys and girls in school who though they were in the wrong body, obviously a reference to transexuals. At the same time childrens’ behaviour and motivation was seen to be very good, and exam results above average with children achieving higher grades than expected!
I said a few years ago when speaking to a group of people that in a few years the UK would become like it was in Nazi Germany in the 1930s if things were allowed to go on as they were going on. We are now much further down that road and if you have not woken up by now then nothing will wake you.

I wonder how on earth I survived at school without all this legislation to protect me against hate crime. How on earth did we all survive into adulthood? I don’t know how many times I was abused verbally at school or how many names I was called, but mercifully I seem to have forgotten it all. To be fair I don’t think I received that much abuse, but it’s all forgiven and forgotten. I even believe in treating all people with dignity and respect regardless of creed, colour or sex, again all without the help of all this legislation, although I would not tolerate all behaviours, which might put me at odds with some of the commisars of the new order. Funnily enough these values were taught to me from a Christian background.

Part of all this rough and tumble at school is reality, a microcosm of reality. Nastiness, bullying and manipulation is part of life, sadly, and we all have to deal with it in our own way. For children at school it is part of the developing process, and it can make or break youngsters, but it is patently not the role of the State to impose its ideology on our children. Nastiness and bullying, etc. has to be dealt with. Often it is dealt with through one’s own developing box of tools for dealing with opposition, so for example I seem to remember using my fists on some occasions, and that proved quite effective. I am glad to say I have evolved beyond using that method of conflict resolution! Wise teachers and other school staff are there to help protect the sensitive egos of children when need be. At school we can learn to fend for ourselves, how to deal with different types of people, and to hone our verbal (and sometimes physical!) skills to deal with abuse and bullying.

Slowly but surely people are waking up to what is going on. The regulation of childrens’ behaviour reported in the Daily Mail shows how far the State has intruded into areas that it has no business in. At best it is highly impertinent, at the worst, manifestly evil. Another sign of the State’s relentless erosion of the responsibilities of schools and parents.
It is now time for the people of these islands to clamour for change, that these things are not acceptable in a once free society. The older generation have a special responsibility at this time as they remember how it used to be when the British people were relatively free and were not indoctrinated with state sponsored ideology about things like diversity and discrimination. The younger generation have been conditioned to the new morality of equality and diversity

It is now time for this edifice of political correctness and control to be brought crashing down as the stinking offence it is to any free society, and it is time for the Davids to rise up to defeat the Goliaths that have established themselves in high places in the media, politics and the law courts. This is a battle on all fronts, as the anti-freedom and pro control brigade want access to all areas. The whole European continent needs a bottom up revolution to sweep away the whole rotten edifice, that has risen up as a counterfeit means of control as opposed to the simple beauty of self-policing. This will require men and women of immense character and courage, who can face down absolutely anyone without fear or favour, especially those who trumpet the full set of ‘phobias’ that are supposed to blight western civilisation. Things can change a little bit at a time, but change they can!